
A strange thing happened over the holidays. It appears the anti-nuke
crowd got cordoned off at Hippy Hollow.
An abbreviated Houston Chronicle story
that ran in the X-News
listed two Austin groups as opposing our City-owned CPS's
plans for two new nuclear plants. While I would have thought an astute
copy desk editor would have made an effort here, the story stood.
Stranger yet, when the local daily's energy writer "localized"
the story in a recent blog, she failed to include local groups. Who was
it storming the CPS meetings downtown and following the utility's PR
flacks on the speaking circuit with bullhorns? Well, those would be San
Antonians, many unaffiliated, but including members of the Southwest
Workers Union and the Alamo Area Sierra Club. There have been folks up
from Kingsville and Goliad, where uranium mining is happening and may
be on the way, respectively. And there have been the Austin groups,
too, without a doubt.
The problem with the X-News
representation is that it makes the whole matter appear to be an
outsider issue. In truth it is an issue the whole region is contending
with. The day that CPS took their vote approving $216 million for
nuke-related projects, there were some comments made about the Austin
"crazies" causing a ruckus. But as folks from South Texas started
taking the mic and explaining what uranium exploration and mining is
already doing to regional water supplies some utility folks were given
pause. The realization that this is anything but an Austin-vs-SA issue
was very clear that day, if it hasn't been clear in the local paper of
late.
Meanwhile, a national campaign by the Nuclear
Information and Resource Service opposing the reanimation
of the country's nuclear power industry has enlisted 416 U.S.
organizations, 146 international, as well as more than 6,000
individuals. Pretty good considering they're not the most prominent
non-prof out there…
"We do not
support construction of new nuclear reactors as a means of addressing
the climate crisis. Available renewable energy and energy efficiency
technologies are faster, cheaper, safer and cleaner strategies for
reducing greenhouse emissions than nuclear power."
Texas signers to date:
Sustainable Energy and
Economic Development (SEED) Coalition, Austin, TX
South Texas Opposes
Pollution, Martindale, TX
Collective Vision, La
Marque, TX
Oil Patch Democrats,
Houston, TX
Environment Texas,
Austin, TX
Southwest Workers Union,
San Antonio, TX
El Paso Regional Sierra
Club Group, Sierra Blanca, TX
Texas Fund for Nuclear
Responsibility, Austin, TX
Texas Center for Policy
Studies, Austin, TX
Garcia Hill Residents
Opposed to Uranium Mining, Kingsville, TX
While the local Sierra Club hasn't signed yet (they weren't familiar
with NIRS when we contacted them this week about it), their energy
policy recommendations to the city are clearly contra-nuclear.
It'd be nice if readers of the X-News were allowed full access to the actual dynamics of resistence at work here.
Art blogs
Emvergeoning
Glasstire
Artlies
Incident Light
Art Beat (Express-News)
Other blogs
Meet New People (Darren & Jessica Guy)
100 In The Shade
Rhetoric & Rhythm
A White Chocolate Mess
Visit the Riverwalk
BexarCountyLine.com
SavorSA
Did we miss your favorite?
Email it to us