
By Enrique Lopetegui
elopetegui@sacurrent.com
On
July 17, laundry workers, housekeepers, bellboys and other employees at
the San Antonio Grand Hyatt Regency Hotel were scheduled to vote
whether to unionize, but the vote was canceled after a “union buster”
told them, the workers said, “If you vote to become a union, you might
lose your job and benefits at the Hyatt.”
“We canceled it due to
the aggressive tactics of the hotel management,” Daniel Ovalle,
houseman at the Grand Hyatt’s housekeeping department, told the Current
during a meeting at a shop in Main Plaza. “They brought in a union
buster named Héctor Flores, from California, to intimidate the workers
and make them side with the hotel.”
Other tactics, according to
Ovalle, included “captive audience meetings with [all] department
managers and their employees, telling them lies about the union and
scaring them off.”
The organizers were worried the tactics were
successful and Hyatt had scared enough workers that they might lose the
vote, and Hyatt could claim that “they had the chance, and they voted
no union,” according to Ovalle.
“But that’s not the case,”
Ovalle said. “We decided to cancel the vote because we felt it was
going to be a corrupted vote. If you bring a union buster to scare the
living daylights out of the housekeepers and other departments, that’s
going to affect your vote.”
According to Ovalle, “Héctor” spent “almost a whole month” at the hotel before the July 17 vote.
“Over
60 percent [of the workers] signed for the union back in February,”
said Jay Mehta, an organizer from Unite Here, which represents hotel
workers nationwide. “But then they got scared with threats of losing
their jobs if they voted for the union, which is illegal to do, but
they do it anyway.”
So, who is Héctor Flores?
“He looks
like an average, run-of-the-mill guy… If you met him on the street, you
wouldn’t be like, ‘Wow, this guy is an absolute scumbag,’ ” said
Gabriel Morales, a Hyatt worker who was fired September 1 for, he says,
“being late two minutes to a mandatory meeting on my day off.”
“We’ve
never been penalized before for that; the real reason is that I’m a
very outspoken leader in the room service department,” he told the Current over the phone.
Another source told the Current
that “Mayor Julián Castro has met with some of us, and he said he
understands the worker’s concerns, that he supports labor and labor
supported him during the election, but that he can’t piss off the
hotels.”
“The Mayor doesn’t recall meeting recently with the
workers, so I don’t know where you’re getting that,” said Jaime
Castillo, director of communications for Mayor Castro. “He met with
them early on, when he was elected, he doesn’t remember exactly when.
But in the big scheme of things, this isn’t a city issue –– this is
between the workers and the hotel. It’s not a fight for the Mayor to
pick or bait.”
In October, the San Antonio Grand Hyatt service
workers will join the Unite Here-sponsored seven-city Hope for
Housekeepers campaign, with three events in the city: a 5:30 p.m. “Hope
Quilt” decoration and gathering at Fuerza Unida at 710 New Laredo Hwy;
a 5 a.m. (yes, a.m.) “Hope for Housekeepers” sewing ceremony at the
same location; and a “Hope for Housekeepers” rally and march to City
Hall that will begin on October 15 at 4:30 p.m. in front of the San
Antonio Grand Hyatt. According to Mehta, housekeepers (mostly women) in
seven cities (Boston, LA, Chicago, San Antonio, etc) will make patches
for the Hope Quilt, which will be about 80 feet long by 6 feet wide and
will be presented to the City Council.
“All we want is a clean,
free process [of unionization],” said Ovalle, who said that Unite Here
is “alive and well” inside the Grand Hyatt and the new worker’s
strategy has a more national approach.
The change of gears, it
seems, could not have come at a better time. On September 24,
Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick announced that he plans to urge
state employees to boycott the Hyatt while conducting official state
business, unless the hotel chain rehires the almost 100 housekeepers
the chain fired in August. The workers claim Hyatt asked them to train
their replacements under the pretense that those trainees were
“vacation and holiday fill-ins,” as reported by The Boston Globe. The Hyatt denied those claims.
The
San Antonio labor dispute between the workers and the Grand Hyatt is
not an isolated incident, but part of a larger trend that Business Week called “one of the most successful anti-union wars ever.”
“Private
sector union membership now stands at just 7.5 percent,” wrote UC
Berkeley and London School of Economics’ John Logan in a paper titled U.S. Anti-Union Consultants: A Threat to the Rights of British Workers.
“There are now between 50 million and 60 million Americans who say that
they want union representation but are unable to get it.”
In another paper written by Logan, The Long, Slow Death of Workplace Democracy at the Chinese Daily News, Logan describes the main players in the Southern California anti-union consulting industry.
“The
Burke Groups is just one of a number of consultant firms in Southern
California that specialize in counter-organizing campaigns involving
immigrant workers,” wrote Logan in the report. “Others include Cruz
& Associates, Labor Relations Consultants, Inc., and … ” drum roll
… “… Héctor Flores.”
Grand Hyatt workers Ovalle and Sophie
Martínez (who works at the Grand Hyatt’s convention services
department), as well as former employee Morales, told the Current
that Flores identified himself simply as “Héctor,” and that the hotel
management often met “one-on-one” with the workers to try to discourage
their plans for a union vote.
These and other stories of
hotel-backed “intimidation” on the part of Flores and hotel management
are eerily similar to the ones described by Logan in his reports.
“Consultants
not only advise employers on how to conduct an anti-union campaign, but
also develop, implement and monitor the campaign,” reads the Long, slow death…
report. “They usually work behind the scenes, and train supervisors on
how to interrogate, intimidate and terrify employees. They are
effectively running the workplace for the duration of the campaign.
Consultants use a variety of methods to convey their aggressive
anti-union message,” including “impersonal communication mechanisms …
group ‘captive audience’ meetings (which, in any other walk of life,
would be considered a form of unlawful imprisonment), and personal
mechanisms, especially one-on-one meetings between supervisors and
employees. While consultant campaigns have become significantly more
sophisticated in recent years, their fundamental tactics have remained
remarkably stable since the 1970s. The most significant innovations in
recent years include the greater use of information technology
(anti-union videos, DVDs and websites) and the greater diversity of
consultant personnel.”
But is this the same Héctor Flores we’re
talking about? They’re both from LA, and neither of them seem to be too
much into unions. The workers found some pics of him, but they’re not
too sure he’s the same guy. So the Current called the Hombre Grande at
the Grand Hyatt.
“If you’d like to give me a phone number, I’d
like to call you back. I don’t know who you are,” said Grand Hyatt
general manager Tom Netting when the Current asked him about Flores.
“I’ll check and see … on this … as far as responding to you, and thank
you for the call.”
Fifteen minutes later, Netting called back.
“Any information on anyone working for the hotel in any capacity is confidential between us and that individual,” said Netting.
But the Current didn’t ask about “anyone who works for the hotel,” but about…
“I said anyone who works for the hotel,” Netting interrupted. “That’s my response.”
So Héctor Flores works for Hyatt?
“No … Anyone that works for our hotel in any capacity, that information is confidential. And that’s my response in general.”
Netting asked about our story, and the Current
told him it was about “the Hyatt, the workers, and Héctor Flores.”
Unfortunately, that was all we could say, because all of our questions
had to do with people who work or might work there, and we,
corporate-minded bunch that we are, wouldn’t dare violate the company’s
policy. His rules, not ours. But, hey, whenever he feels like bending
the rules a little bit, he has our number, and God knows we have lots
of questions.
The Current
has reason to believe that Héctor Flores is the same Héctor Flores who
runs Flores Labor Management, Inc., in Anaheim, California. A phone
message left on Saturday was not immediately returned.
To be
involved in a labor dispute in the middle of an economic downturn is
hard but, despite the July vote cancellation, the workers aren’t
slowing down.
“In my department we were all for it, and we felt
we should’ve voted,” said Martínez. “Now we’re still in the struggle,
and hopefully when we finally vote it’ll be for a stronger union.”
“I
know it’s risky, but I want to be here for this fight,” said Ovalle.
“We’re fighting for a better standard of living, better health care,
better working conditions. That’s worth fighting for.”
South Texas political blogs
Jon's Jail Journal
B and B
Dig Deeper Texas
Capitol Annex
The Walker Report
Grits for Breakfast
San Antonio Politics (Express-News)
The Kendallian
Off the Kuff
South Texas Chisme
Concerned Citizens
TexasVox
The Narcosphere
Rhetoric & Rhythm
Did we miss your favorite?
Email it to us